* You are viewing the archive for December, 2009

Geoengineering – Superfreakonomics

Here is an example of how the bizarre gravitates to the mainstream and, with the proper PR spin, can quickly become the accepted solution in the eyes of the unwary public. It has only been a few days since the Copenhagen Conference ended with only a rather meaningless, unenforceable agreement among a few countries to “kick the can down the road”. Voila! The lead article on Drudge this morning (link below) presents the geoengineering scheme to pump sulphur into the atmosphere to create a climate-buffer as described in “SuperFreakonomics” as outlined in the first piece above and in my “Recommended … Continue Reading

ENMOD Excluded from Copenhagen Agenda

Click on Recommended Articles to check out the Michel Chossudovsky article posted today ” Excluded from the Copenhagen Agenda: Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD)and Climate Change.” He questions why NGO’s haven’t been addressing this issue.

The Peace Caucus at the UN has been calling for a review and strengthening of ENMOD for years. We have tried to get military to be addressed in the environmental review conferences (CSD).

The Peace Caucus co-sponsored a panel on “Wild Cards of Climate Change”at the NGO/DPI annual conference in September 2007. This panel addressed the deliberate modification of weather and climate (including weather warfare), the pertinent treaties … Continue Reading

December 6, 2009

In light of the release of the “Climategate” documents I want to spend time this week reviewing how the IPCC has gone to great lengths to avoid addressing the effects of geoengineering and weather modification

December 1, 2009

For approximately the past 45 years, going back to the Kennedy assassination, I have been fascinated by what many have deemed to be “conspiracy theories”, but which I often viewed as the public’s blind acceptance of “official positions” put forth by the government or mainstream media. With the consolidation of control over our newspaper, radio and television interests, any semblance of a “fair and balanced” investigative approach to reporting could only be found by turning to alternative sources of information — often consisting of websites with scary names, repositories for sometimes rather bizarre accounts authored by what … Continue Reading